In the first research, the scientists wished to understand whether high- and low-status people actually do laugh differently.

In the first research, the scientists wished to understand whether high- and low-status people actually do laugh differently.

To evaluate this, 48 male university students had been arbitrarily assigned to sets of four, with every team made up of two low-status people (“pledges” that has simply accompanied a fraternity per month previously) and two high-status people (older students who had previously been mixed up in fraternity for at the very least a couple of years).

Laughter ended up being recorded on video clip given that group people involved with a teasing task. Each person in the team took a turn into the hot chair, getting light teasing from his peers. The teasers created a nickname based on randomly generated sets of initials (age.g., L. Leia mais